Talk about bias tv, the BBC appear very cynical regarding the military takeover. They appear very pro Morsi, despite his failings.
The people don’t want religion they want economic reform. Whilst the army have taken over, what’s the difference between that and a leader destroying all opposition by political legal means.
Jason E Cooper 
Worth checking the BBC bias since the so called Arab Spring. Jeremy Bowen was placed there to support the Muslim Brotherhood, describing it incorrectly as a benign charitable organization, then backing Morsi. He was given journalist awards for this. Now connect with my former student, Mark Mardell, who is the BBC’s chief USA news editor, who has been backing Obama in his support for the Muslim Brotherhood. Now check – oh forget it – numerous US sources which connect Morsi, Obama, Clinton, with the Benghazi killings. Allen West is putting together several legal challenges against Obama and Clinton. There has been a consistent . BBC propaganda campaign supported by a variety of left wing journalists to advance the Muslim Brotherhood in the region. They have censored reports of anti Brotherhood protests, and censored political opposition to the Obama stance on Egypt. Right up until the end the BBC were broadcasting pro Morsi stuff on the Arab network, and I have a recent tape of Obama actually warning the Egyptian army to reinstate Morsi, which is why they are moving so fast to stop Obama using the troops he has already sent there against the citizens..Should Obama intervene you can expect a massive retaliation within the US, something else the BBC have been censoring.